no YOU DIDNT UNDERSTAND ISHHHHHH ...IM ON THE SIDE OF THE SOUTH MUSLIM WHO WERE BUTCHERED BY THAKSIN U GOT IT ????U HEARD ABOUT TAK BAI FROM YOUR BANGKOK CITY OF ANGELS ??? VIEWING ME AS SIDING WITH THE MAJORITY OF RURAL AND FISHING PEOPLE OF THE SOUTH WE ARE ALLL READY TO FUCC THAKSIN WITH A PASSION ...SO COUNT ME AS A SOUTH LOVER THATS A MORE REALISTIC ANGLE SINCE I HAVE MUSLIM THAI FAMILYUnLieutenant a écrit:yeah, the situation is less than perfect. it's quite a stressful influence to have to sleep someplace other than home for three fucking weeks. so, i hate the redshirts for that.
on the other hand, i gotta say i sort of sympathize with their cause. thailand is definitely a country of gross wealth inequalities, and the rule of the so-called "amart" (bureaucratic elite) has to change. yet again, a majority of the reds support the ousted prime minister thaksin shinawatra (you could call him the "berlusconi of southeast asia"). this guy is the archetype of a corrupt and greedy capitalist, and he really rode the country into the shit.
if i understand OG kim correctly, you are firmly on the side of the current ruling elite. i'm not saying this is the wrong side or anything. let me just say, that thailand cannot go on like it is. and when the king dies it will be a whole bloody mess. that's what i'm scared of.
for now, i just mind my own business, cause i cannot really begin to understand the intricacies of thai politics. from my limited understanding it seems that all sides to the conflict have their hands dirty...
Kicket a écrit:mais c'est clair pour le coup, t'es un peu trop sur la défensive là Kim ! chill hein ! si ya bien un mec au coeur du truc avec un regard modéré et a priori lucide sur le conflit, vu qu'il le vit de l'intérieur sans être pour autant partisan d'aucun des 2 camps, c'est bien UnLieutenant, je comprends pas pourquoi tu lui tombes dessus comme ça...![]()
f i understand OG kim correctly, you are firmly on the side of the current ruling elite
i gotta say i sort of sympathize with their cause.
Kicket a écrit:mais c'est clair pour le coup, t'es un peu trop sur la défensive là Kim ! chill hein ! si ya bien un mec au coeur du truc avec un regard modéré et a priori lucide sur le conflit, vu qu'il le vit de l'intérieur sans être pour autant partisan d'aucun des 2 camps, c'est bien UnLieutenant, je comprends pas pourquoi tu lui tombes dessus comme ça...![]()
ECOUTE MA BELLE FAMILLE A ETE PERSECUTTER PAR LE REGIME DE THAKSIN JE NE RENTRERAI PAS DANS LES DETAILS ...ALORS KAND JE RELIS SON POST ON VOI CLAIREMENT KIL NAIME PAS THAKSIN MAIS KIL SYMPATISE A SA CAUSE ..ET KIL MASSIMILLE CLAIREMENT A UN PRO ELITE ACTUEL ALORS KE JE DEFEND LA CAUSE DES MINORITER ETHNIK BIRMANE ET MUSULMAN ...TU VOI TOUJOURS PAS ????CEST ILLISIBLE ??UnLieutenant a écrit:yeah, the situation is less than perfect. it's quite a stressful influence to have to sleep someplace other than home for three fucking weeks. so, i hate the redshirts for that.
on the other hand, i gotta say i sort of sympathize with their cause. thailand is definitely a country of gross wealth inequalities, and the rule of the so-called "amart" (bureaucratic elite) has to change. yet again, a majority of the reds support the ousted prime minister thaksin shinawatra (you could call him the "berlusconi of southeast asia"). this guy is the archetype of a corrupt and greedy capitalist, and he really rode the country into the shit.
if i understand OG kim correctly, you are firmly on the side of the current ruling elite. i'm not saying this is the wrong side or anything. let me just say, that thailand cannot go on like it is. and when the king dies it will be a whole bloody mess. that's what i'm scared of.
for now, i just mind my own business, cause i cannot really begin to understand the intricacies of thai politics. from my limited understanding it seems that all sides to the conflict have their hands dirty...
yet again, a majority of the reds support the ousted prime minister thaksin shinawatra
UnLieutenant a écrit: why the hell they support that demagogue thaksin is beyond my understanding though...
chiên têt a écrit:UnLieutenant a écrit: why the hell they support that demagogue thaksin is beyond my understanding though...
Actually It is just because he used to lend them money when he was Prime Minister .
I don't know exactly the rate but it was a very interesting one.Put simply , a thai familly was allowed to borrow 20000 baht by year and had to give back 21000 baht. I saw that when i was living in a small village near NONG KHAI in ISSAN.
that is a reason why Thaksin has got a lot of supporters among the low class people.
Utilisateur(s) parcourant ce forum : Aucun utilisateur inscrit et 118 invité(s)